Earth Planets Space, Vol. 52 (No. 12), pp. 1183-1186, 2000
F. J. Lowes1, T. Bondar2, V. P. Golovkov2, B. Langlais3, S. Macmillan4, and M. Mandea3
1Physics Department, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, U.K.
2IZMIRAN, 142092 Troitsk, Moscow region, Russia
3Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Laboratoire de Géomagnétisme, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 5, France
4British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3LA, U.K.
(Received February 14, 2000; Revised May 24, 2000; Accepted May 24, 2000)
Abstract: On this occasion the selection of the IGRF for 2000 was left to a small Task Force. Before it was accepted by the Task Force as IGRF 2000, the final candidate model (a truncated version of Ørsted(10c/99)) was compared with a comprehensive set of independent surface and satellite data. The method, data selection, and results of this comparison are described.